Strategy

Balanced

An alternative to the classic 60/40 portfolio. 46% is in stocks. The rest does not rely on bonds alone: it is spread across Treasuries, cash, commodities, gold, trend following and an anti-beta hedge. Built to grow like 60/40 and fall less, including when stocks and bonds fall together.

11.7%a year over 10 years60/40: 9.8%
9.4%volatility60/40: 10.6%
0.98Sharpe ratio60/40: 0.71
0.47beta to the S&P 50060/40: 0.57

Ten years to Oct 15, 2026, after trading costs. Beta: how much the portfolio moves when the S&P 500 moves by 1. A 60/40 portfolio (60% S&P 500, 40% Treasuries) is shown for comparison.

What it holds

Weights are fixed. At the start of every quarter each holding is traded back to its exact target weight.

Technology

15%

The growth engine: the technology companies of the S&P 500, from chips to software.

XLK

US technology

The growth engine: the technology companies of the S&P 500

15%

Diversifying equities

31%

Stocks chosen to behave differently from technology, so that equity returns do not hang on one sector.

SCHD

US dividend companies

Strong balance sheets, steady dividends, little technology

9%
XLV

US health care

Demand that does not follow the economic cycle

7%
DGRW

Quality dividend growth

Profitable companies that keep raising their dividends

6%
XLU

US utilities

Steady, regulated earnings; sensitive to interest rates

5%
RSP

S&P 500 equal weight

All 500 companies at the same weight: breadth beyond the largest names

4%

Bonds and cash

18%

Income and stability. Treasuries also cushion a growth scare, though not an inflation shock.

IEF

US Treasuries 7–10 years

Gains when growth fears pull yields down; loses in inflation shocks

8%
SHYG

Short-term high yield

Income from short-dated corporate bonds

6%
SGOV

Treasury bills (cash)

Stability, and funds for rebalancing

4%

Commodities

17%

A broad commodity fund and gold: protection against inflation and a weaker dollar.

HGER

Broad commodities

Protection when inflation rises

12%
GLDM

Gold

Protection against a weaker dollar and a loss of trust in policy

5%

Trend and hedges

19%

Strategies that can gain while stocks fall: trend following and an anti-beta fund.

DBMF

Trend following (managed futures)

Gains in long bear markets and inflation shocks; loses in sudden reversals

16%
BTAL

Anti-beta (market neutral)

Gains when the riskiest stocks fall hardest

3%

Performance

One continuous portfolio since 2007, sliced to the window you pick. Returns count every day of the window, from the close before its first day.

Balanced+202.97%60/40+154.24%S&P 500+324.34%
0%+100%+200%+300%20172019202120232025

From the Oct 14, 2016 close to the Oct 15, 2026 close · 2,513 trading days. Chart points are weekly closes; statistics use every trading day.

Total returnAnnual returnVolatilityMax drawdownSharpe ratioTurnover a yearTrading costs a year
Balanced+202.97%11.72%9.35%−18.84%0.9820%0.04%
60/40+154.24%9.78%10.58%−21.30%0.7115%0.03%
S&P 500+324.34%15.55%17.95%−33.70%0.770%0.00%

Across horizons

Long histories use monthly data and, before some funds existed, labelled proxies and models (see Methodology).

10 yearsSince 20081999–2026 (monthly)2000–02 dot-com crash
ReturnMax drawdownReturnMax drawdownReturnMax drawdownMax drawdown
Balanced11.7%−19%8.5%−30%8.0%−27%−17%
60/409.8%−21%8.4%−31%7.1%−29%−20%
S&P 50015.5%−34%11.3%−52%8.7%−51%−45%

In sell-offs

Smaller falls, even when bonds fail

A 60/40 portfolio is protected only while bonds rise as stocks fall. Balanced shares that job between Treasuries, commodities, trend following, gold and cash. Since 2007 the S&P 500 has dropped sharply 13 times.

13 of 13
sell-offs in which Balanced fell less than the S&P 500
45%
of the S&P 500's combined fall. A 60/40 portfolio took 57%
−5% vs −21%
Balanced against 60/40 in 2022, when bonds fell with stocks

When Treasuries rallied, in 2010, 2011 and 2020, a 60/40 portfolio held up as well or slightly better. When bonds fell together with stocks, in 2022, 2023 and early 2026, 60/40 had nothing else to lean on. Balanced did.

Balanced60/40S&P 500

Every fall of 10% or more in the S&P 500

2008 financial crisisOct 2007 – Mar 2009
−25.7%
−31.8%
−55.2%
2010 euro crisis and flash crashApr 2010 – Jul 2010
−7.5%
−6.7%
−15.7%
2011 debt crisisApr 2011 – Oct 2011
−7.7%
−6.0%
−18.6%
2015–16 China and oilMay 2015 – Feb 2016
−7.1%
−5.4%
−13.0%
February 2018 volatility shockJan 2018 – Feb 2018
−7.0%
−6.7%
−10.1%
2018 Fed tighteningSep 2018 – Dec 2018
−9.3%
−10.3%
−19.3%
2020 COVID crashFeb 2020 – Mar 2020
−18.8%
−17.8%
−33.7%
2022 inflation and rate risesJan 2022 – Oct 2022
−5.2%
−20.8%
−24.5%
2023 bond-yield surgeJul 2023 – Oct 2023
−3.7%
−8.1%
−10.0%
2025 tariff shockFeb 2025 – Apr 2025
−9.3%
−10.6%
−18.8%

Smaller, recent scares

August 2024 yen carry unwindJul 2024 – Aug 2024
−5.0%
−3.8%
−8.4%
2026 Iran war and oil shockJan 2026 – Mar 2026
−1.2%
−5.4%
−8.9%
2026 momentum and AI-chip crashJun 2026 – Jul 2026Nasdaq-100 −10.3% · semiconductors −24.6%
+0.7%
−1.4%
−2.0%

Change in value, dividends included, between the S&P 500's closing high and closing low in each sell-off. In the 2026 momentum and AI-chip crash the dates are the semiconductor index's high and low.

Compare and test

Put it next to the other strategy, or change the weights yourself in the constructor: the same engine, costs and data.

Compare with AggressiveOpen the constructor